People who run programs for low-income job seekers and those seeking to promote policies that can improve employment outcomes for low-income individuals need evidence about what works.
Related Projects for Dana Rotz
The Pathways to Work Evidence Clearinghouse: The What Works Clearinghouse of Proven and Promising Approaches to Move Welfare Recipients to WorkMay 28, 2019
Workforce Investment Act Adult and Dislocated Worker Programs Gold Standard EvaluationMay 18, 2018
In 2008, the U.S. Department of Labor’s Employment and Training Administration commissioned Mathematica to conduct a national random assignment evaluation of the Workforce Investment Act Adult and Dislocated Worker programs' effectiveness.
Clearinghouse for Labor Evaluation and Research (CLEAR)Mar 23, 2016
CLEAR’s mission is to make research on labor topics more accessible to practitioners, policymakers, researchers, and the general public so that it can inform their decisions about labor policies and programs.
Bihar, India: Measurement Learning and Evaluation for the Family Health InitiativeOct 16, 2015
Mathematica is leading the measurement, learning, and evaluation component of the Ananya program, formerly known as the Family Health Initiative, in Bihar, India.
Evaluation of Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention ApproachesJun 05, 2015
This eight-year evaluation documented and tested promising pregnancy prevention approaches in seven sites across the United States, each of which implemented a different program.
Evaluating Outcomes and Impacts of Social Enterprises Run by REDF's Portfolio OrganizationsFeb 05, 2015
Mathematica's evaluation—the Mathematica Jobs Study or MJS—included five evaluations: (1) an implementation study, (2) an outcomes study, (3) a quasi-experimental design (QED) study, (4) a monitoring study, and (5) a cost benefit analysis (CBA).